New York has construed the Ontario guest statute as precluding recovery in Ontario by a social guest, irrespective of residence, for Ontario occasioned accidents. ( Hall v. Bardol, 260 App. Div. 982, affd. 285 N.Y. 726; St. George v. Colletta, 32 Misc.2d 883; Jewtraw v. Davis, 277 App. Div. 918; Carlin v. Carlin, 29 N.Y.S.2d 925; Olson v. Kilian, 203 Misc. 847.) (For the question of recovery in New York see the recent decision of the Court of Appeals in Babcock v. Jackson, 12 N.Y.2d 473.) In Jewtraw v. Davis ( supra) (1950), the report shows that Canadian experts testified as to the statute in question but no mention is made of an Ontario distinction on the basis of the residence of the guest in the Ontario application of the rule.