From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hall v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF VERMONT
May 2, 2012
Docket No. 2:11 CV 37 (D. Vt. May. 2, 2012)

Opinion

Docket No. 2:11 CV 37

05-02-2012

Susie McCoy Hall, Administrator of The Estate of Barry D. Facto, Plaintiff, v. Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


ORDER

The Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge was filed April 9, 2012. After careful review of the file and the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, no objections having been filed by any party, this Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's recommendations in full for the reasons stated in the Report.

The Plaintiff's Motion to Reverse Decision of Commissioner (Doc. 14) is GRANTED, and the Commissioner's Motion for Order Affirming Decision of Commissioner (Doc. 19) is DENIED, and the matter is REMANDED for further proceedings and a new decision.

Dated at Burlington, in the District of Vermont, this 2nd day of May, 2012.

___________

William K. Sessions III

U.S. District Court Judge


Summaries of

Hall v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF VERMONT
May 2, 2012
Docket No. 2:11 CV 37 (D. Vt. May. 2, 2012)
Case details for

Hall v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:Susie McCoy Hall, Administrator of The Estate of Barry D. Facto…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF VERMONT

Date published: May 2, 2012

Citations

Docket No. 2:11 CV 37 (D. Vt. May. 2, 2012)