Hall v. Astrue

1 Citing case

  1. K. D. v. Commissioner of Social Security

    Case No. 1:10-cv-654 (N.D. Ohio Jul. 25, 2011)

    It considers the non-medical factors which do not constitute work-related functional limitations, and therefore do not necessarily translate into functional limitations for the purpose of assessing Social Security disability. Id. ( citing Hall v. Astrue, 1:10-cv-0160, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 134247 at *20, 2010 WL 5128335 (E. D. Cal. 2010) (quotation marks omitted). Thus, "[w]hile a GAF score may be of considerable help to the ALJ [in making a decision], it is not essential to the [decision's] accuracy."