From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hall v. Alameida

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 27, 2006
No. CIV S-03-1595 DFL KJM P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 27, 2006)

Opinion

No. CIV S-03-1595 DFL KJM P.

February 27, 2006


ORDER


On October 31, 2005, defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff has not filed an opposition to the motion.

Local Rule 78-230(m) provides in part: "Failure of the responding party to file written opposition or to file a statement of no opposition may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the motion. . . ." On May 10, 2004 plaintiff was advised of the requirements for filing an opposition to the motion and that failure to oppose such a motion may be deemed a waiver of opposition to the motion.

Local Rule 11-110 provides that failure to comply with the Local Rules "may be grounds for imposition of any and all sanctions authorized by statute or Rule or within the inherent power of the Court." In the order filed May 10, 2004, plaintiff was advised that failure to comply with the Local Rules may result in a recommendation that the action be dismissed.

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, within thirty days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall file an opposition, if any, to the motion for summary judgment. Failure to file an opposition will be deemed as a statement of non-opposition and shall result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed pursuant Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).


Summaries of

Hall v. Alameida

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 27, 2006
No. CIV S-03-1595 DFL KJM P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 27, 2006)
Case details for

Hall v. Alameida

Case Details

Full title:GREGORY ANDREW HALL, Plaintiff, v. EDWARD R. ALAMEIDA, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 27, 2006

Citations

No. CIV S-03-1595 DFL KJM P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 27, 2006)