From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hall v. 130-10 Food Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 1, 1998
254 A.D.2d 22 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

October 1, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Barry Salman, J.).


The sought-after discovery material, documentation of prior accidents similar to that at issue here, should have been granted. It was relevant in this negligence action to establish that third-party defendant had notice of a particular, dangerous condition ( Coan v. Long Is. R.R., 246 A.D.2d 569). "While materiality and necessity [CPLR 3101 (a)] obviously place some limits on the scope of disclosure, disclosure should be permitted as long as the information sought bears on the controversy and will assist in the preparation for trial; the ultimate test is one of `"usefulness and reason"'" ( Matter of New York County DES Litig., 171 A.D.2d 119, 123, quoting O'Neill v. Oakgrove Constr., 71 N.Y.2d 521, 526, quoting Allen v. Crowell-Collier Publ. Co., 21 N.Y.2d 403, 406).

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Milonas, Rubin, Williams and Andrias, JJ.


Summaries of

Hall v. 130-10 Food Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 1, 1998
254 A.D.2d 22 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Hall v. 130-10 Food Corp.

Case Details

Full title:JOHN M. HALL et al., Plaintiffs, v. 130-10 FOOD CORP., Doing Business as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 1, 1998

Citations

254 A.D.2d 22 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
677 N.Y.S.2d 923

Citing Cases

MBIA Ins. Corp. v. Residential Funding Co.

Neither am I convinced by RFC's argument that the Commissions sought are broader than is necessary and seek…

Daniels v. the City of New York

We find, however, that the motion court improvidently exercised its discretion in setting a one-year time…