From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Halko v. Cobb

Supreme Court of Delaware
Sep 13, 2001
784 A.2d 1080 (Del. 2001)

Opinion

No. 410, 2001

Decided: September 13, 2001

Superior Court New Castle County, C.A. No. 99C-01-213.


APPEAL REFUSED

Unpublised Opinion is below.

MARITA HALKO, individually and as guardian ad litem of her minor, son, KARL T. HALKO, and KARL T. HALKO, individually, Defendant Below-Appellant, v. LINDA K. COBB, as guardian ad litem for her minor daughter JACLYN K. COBB, Plaintiff Below-Appellee. No. 410, 2001 In the Supreme Court of the State of Delaware. Decided: September 13, 2001

Before WALSH, BERGER and STEELE, Justices.

Myron T. Steele Justice

ORDER

This 13th day of August 2001, it appears to the Court that:

(1) The defendants below, Marita Halko and Karlo Halko, have petitioned this Court, pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 42, to appeal from an interlocutory ruling of the Superior Court issued August 3, 2001. The Superior Court's ruling denied the defendants' motion for summary judgment. The defendants had argued that the plaintiff's claim was barred by the applicable statute of limitations.

(2) On September 4, 2001, the Superior Court denied the defendants' application to certify an interlocutory appeal to this Court.

(3) Applications for interlocutory review are addressed to the sound discretion of this Court and are granted only in extraordinary cases.

(4) In the exercise of its discretion, this Court has concluded that the application for interlocutory review does not meet the requirements of Supreme Court Rule 42(b) and should be refused.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the within interlocutory appeal is REFUSED.


Summaries of

Halko v. Cobb

Supreme Court of Delaware
Sep 13, 2001
784 A.2d 1080 (Del. 2001)
Case details for

Halko v. Cobb

Case Details

Full title:MARITA HALKO, individually and as guardian ad litem of her minor, son…

Court:Supreme Court of Delaware

Date published: Sep 13, 2001

Citations

784 A.2d 1080 (Del. 2001)