From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Haliburton v. City of Ferndale

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan
May 16, 2022
2:21-cv-10864 (E.D. Mich. May. 16, 2022)

Opinion

2:21-cv-10864

05-16-2022

M arteze Haliburton, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF FERNDALE, a Michigan Municipal Corporation, d/b/a FERNDALE POLICE DEPARTMENT, BRANDON SZCZESNIAK, JUSTIN HARWOOD, KEVIN JEROME, and NATHAN BODENDORFER, in their individual and official capacities, Defendants.

Joel B. Sklar Seward Henderson PLLC T. Joseph Seward Kali M. L. Henderson Michael A. Knoblock Perkins Law Group, PLLC By: Todd Russell Perkins Stephen J. Chacko


Joel B. Sklar

Seward Henderson PLLC

T. Joseph Seward

Kali M. L. Henderson

Michael A. Knoblock

Perkins Law Group, PLLC

By: Todd Russell Perkins

Stephen J. Chacko

ANTHONY P. PATTI, MAG. JUDGE

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

HONORABLE TERRENCE G. BERG UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 1

In order to maintain the confidentiality, goals, and spirit of MCL 15.395, as well as the safety and efficiency of the Ferndale Police Department, the parties agree to the following terms and it is ordered that:

1. All involuntary statements, including any and all compelled statements provided in the course of this litigation are subject to the following, consistent with the MCL 15.395, which requires Courts to preserve the confidentiality of such statements:

a. That the above described documents shall not be made public, and shall be disclosed to only those directly participating in the present litigation. Under no circumstances shall the documents be disclosed to anyone not regularly employed by Plaintiffs' Counsel's law firm and currently working on this case without prior, written consent from the Defendants;
b. That Counsel shall obtain the written agreement to abide by the terms of this Protective Order from any person before being shown the above documents, and will provide such agreements to Defendants upon receipt;
c. No party shall file the above described documents without first requesting that it be done under seal. Parties must strictly follow the requirements under E.D. Mich. LR 5.3. Only the portion of the document(s) which are not to be publicly disclosed may be filed under seal. The portion to be filed under seal requires an endorsement by the Court on a cover page. A party's presentment to the Court for the endorsement shall be accompanied by an explanation why the portion of the document(s) is confidential;
d. That all of the above documents, including all copies, shall be returned to defense counsel at the conclusion of litigation;
2
e. That neither party shall be precluded from raising the issue of admissibility of the above described documents at any court proceeding or any ordered mediation at a later time if necessary.

2. The above protections shall also apply to any internal policy documents of the Ferndale Police Department produced in response to Plaintiff's First Request for Production of Documents. 3


Summaries of

Haliburton v. City of Ferndale

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan
May 16, 2022
2:21-cv-10864 (E.D. Mich. May. 16, 2022)
Case details for

Haliburton v. City of Ferndale

Case Details

Full title:M arteze Haliburton, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF FERNDALE, a Michigan Municipal…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Michigan

Date published: May 16, 2022

Citations

2:21-cv-10864 (E.D. Mich. May. 16, 2022)