From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Haley v. Cohen & Steers Capital Mgmt. Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND
Nov 23, 2011
Case No. C10-03856-PJH (N.D. Cal. Nov. 23, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. C10-03856-PJH

11-23-2011

JANET HALEY, Plaintiff, v. COHEN & STEERS CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, INC., A New York Corporation Doing Business in California; and DAVID EDLIN, an individual, Defendants.

SHEA LAW OFFICES Mary Shea Hagebols (SBN 113222) Attorneys for Plaintiff JANET HALEY VAN DE POEL, LEVY & ALLEN LLP Jeffrey W. Allen (SBN 099240) SEYFARTH SHAW LLP Francis J. Ortman III (SBN 213202) Matthew J. Mason (SBN 271344) Andrea N. de Koning (SBN 253715) Attorneys for Defendant COHEN & STEERS CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, INC. AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLP Catherine A. Conway (SBN 98366) Attorneys for Defendant DAVID EDLIN


SHEA LAW OFFICES

Mary Shea Hagebols (SBN 113222)

Attorneys for Plaintiff

JANET HALEY

VAN DE POEL, LEVY & ALLEN LLP

Jeffrey W. Allen (SBN 099240)

SEYFARTH SHAW LLP

Francis J. Ortman III (SBN 213202)

Matthew J. Mason (SBN 271344)

Andrea N. de Koning (SBN 253715)

Attorneys for Defendant

COHEN & STEERS CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, INC.

AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLP

Catherine A. Conway (SBN 98366)

Attorneys for Defendant

DAVID EDLIN

STIPULATION AND ORDER

REGARDING DEFENDANT COHEN &

STEERS' ADDITIONAL WRITTEN

INTERROGATORIES TO PLAINTIFF

JANET HALEY

Plaintiff Janet Haley ("Haley") and Defendants Cohen & Steers Capital Management, Inc. ("Cohen & Steers") and David Edlin ("Edlin") (collectively, "Defendants") (collectively, "the Parties"), by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate as follows:

WHEREAS, Defendant Cohen & Steers issued twenty-five (25) written interrogatories to Plaintiff Janet Haley, the maximum permitted without an agreement among the parties or court order under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 33, before Plaintiff disclosed her employment with Advisors Asset Management, Inc. The Parties acknowledge there is good cause for Defendant Cohen & Steers to issue additional written interrogatories to Plaintiff regarding her employment.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and among the Parties, through their respective undersigned counsel, that Defendant Cohen & Steers shall be permitted to issue six (6) additional written interrogatories to Plaintiff Janet Haley regarding her employment with Advisors Asset Management., Inc. The Parties further agree that Defendant Cohen & Steers will not subpoena Plaintiff's employment records from Advisors Asset Management, Inc. provided that she provides full and complete responses to its interrogatories. The Parties further agree that should Defendant Cohen & Steers contend that Plaintiff has not provided full and complete responses to its interrogatories, Defendant Cohen & Steers will meet and confer with Plaintiff before issuing a subpoena for Plaintiff's employment records from Advisors Asset Management, Inc.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

SEYFARTH SHAW LLP

Andrea N. de Koning

Attorneys for Defendant

COHEN & STEERS CAPITAL

MANAGEMENT, INC.

SHEA LAW OFFICES

Mary Shea Hagebols

Attorney for Plaintiff Janet Haley

VAN DE POEL LEVY & ALLEN LLP

Jeffrey William Allen

Attorneys for Plaintiff Janet Haley

AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD

LLP

Catherine A. Conway

Attorneys for Defendant David Edlin

ORDER

It is hereby ORDERED that Defendant Cohen & Steers shall be permitted to issue six (6) additional written interrogatories to Plaintiff Janet Haley regarding her employment with Advisors Asset Management., Inc., pursuant to Rule 33 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the terms of the above stipulation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton


Summaries of

Haley v. Cohen & Steers Capital Mgmt. Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND
Nov 23, 2011
Case No. C10-03856-PJH (N.D. Cal. Nov. 23, 2011)
Case details for

Haley v. Cohen & Steers Capital Mgmt. Inc.

Case Details

Full title:JANET HALEY, Plaintiff, v. COHEN & STEERS CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, INC., A New…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND

Date published: Nov 23, 2011

Citations

Case No. C10-03856-PJH (N.D. Cal. Nov. 23, 2011)