Opinion
Case No. C10-03856-PJH
11-23-2011
JANET HALEY, Plaintiff, v. COHEN & STEERS CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, INC., A New York Corporation Doing Business in California; and DAVID EDLIN, an individual, Defendants.
SHEA LAW OFFICES Mary Shea Hagebols (SBN 113222) Attorneys for Plaintiff JANET HALEY VAN DE POEL, LEVY & ALLEN LLP Jeffrey W. Allen (SBN 099240) SEYFARTH SHAW LLP Francis J. Ortman III (SBN 213202) Matthew J. Mason (SBN 271344) Andrea N. de Koning (SBN 253715) Attorneys for Defendant COHEN & STEERS CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, INC. AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLP Catherine A. Conway (SBN 98366) Attorneys for Defendant DAVID EDLIN
SHEA LAW OFFICES
Mary Shea Hagebols (SBN 113222)
Attorneys for Plaintiff
JANET HALEY
VAN DE POEL, LEVY & ALLEN LLP
Jeffrey W. Allen (SBN 099240)
SEYFARTH SHAW LLP
Francis J. Ortman III (SBN 213202)
Matthew J. Mason (SBN 271344)
Andrea N. de Koning (SBN 253715)
Attorneys for Defendant
COHEN & STEERS CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, INC.
AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLP
Catherine A. Conway (SBN 98366)
Attorneys for Defendant
DAVID EDLIN
STIPULATION AND ORDER
REGARDING DEFENDANT COHEN &
STEERS' ADDITIONAL WRITTEN
INTERROGATORIES TO PLAINTIFF
JANET HALEY
Plaintiff Janet Haley ("Haley") and Defendants Cohen & Steers Capital Management, Inc. ("Cohen & Steers") and David Edlin ("Edlin") (collectively, "Defendants") (collectively, "the Parties"), by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate as follows:
WHEREAS, Defendant Cohen & Steers issued twenty-five (25) written interrogatories to Plaintiff Janet Haley, the maximum permitted without an agreement among the parties or court order under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 33, before Plaintiff disclosed her employment with Advisors Asset Management, Inc. The Parties acknowledge there is good cause for Defendant Cohen & Steers to issue additional written interrogatories to Plaintiff regarding her employment.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and among the Parties, through their respective undersigned counsel, that Defendant Cohen & Steers shall be permitted to issue six (6) additional written interrogatories to Plaintiff Janet Haley regarding her employment with Advisors Asset Management., Inc. The Parties further agree that Defendant Cohen & Steers will not subpoena Plaintiff's employment records from Advisors Asset Management, Inc. provided that she provides full and complete responses to its interrogatories. The Parties further agree that should Defendant Cohen & Steers contend that Plaintiff has not provided full and complete responses to its interrogatories, Defendant Cohen & Steers will meet and confer with Plaintiff before issuing a subpoena for Plaintiff's employment records from Advisors Asset Management, Inc.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
SEYFARTH SHAW LLP
Andrea N. de Koning
Attorneys for Defendant
COHEN & STEERS CAPITAL
MANAGEMENT, INC.
SHEA LAW OFFICES
Mary Shea Hagebols
Attorney for Plaintiff Janet Haley
VAN DE POEL LEVY & ALLEN LLP
Jeffrey William Allen
Attorneys for Plaintiff Janet Haley
AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD
LLP
Catherine A. Conway
Attorneys for Defendant David Edlin
ORDER
It is hereby ORDERED that Defendant Cohen & Steers shall be permitted to issue six (6) additional written interrogatories to Plaintiff Janet Haley regarding her employment with Advisors Asset Management., Inc., pursuant to Rule 33 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the terms of the above stipulation.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton