From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hale v. Worstell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 1, 1905
110 App. Div. 918 (N.Y. App. Div. 1905)

Opinion

December, 1905.


We think there was power at the Special Term to make the order appealed from, but that the discretion was not judiciously exercised in this case. No injury can occur by respecting the judgment of the Special Term and of this court pending the appeal to the Court of Appeals, and it does not appear to us as a proper case for suspending its operation. Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with costs. Hirschberg, P.J., Bartlett, Woodward, Jenks and Rich, JJ., concurred.


Summaries of

Hale v. Worstell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 1, 1905
110 App. Div. 918 (N.Y. App. Div. 1905)
Case details for

Hale v. Worstell

Case Details

Full title:William H. Hale, Appellant, v. John P. Worstell and Joseph P. McNamara…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 1, 1905

Citations

110 App. Div. 918 (N.Y. App. Div. 1905)