Opinion
22-10300
10-13-2022
VENETTE HALE, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al., Defendants.
Jonathan J.C. Grey Magistrate Judge
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (ECF NO. 44) AND GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT NALC-AFL-CIO BRANCH NO. 3126'S MOTION TO DISMISS (ECF NO. 17)
Shalina D. Kumar United States District Judge
Venetta Hale brings this complaint pro se against the United States of America, NALC-AFL-CIO Branch No. 3126 (Branch), and Glynis Gilder. ECF No. 1. Hale alleges wrongful termination, defamation, and unlawful withholding of back pay against the United States; two breaches of the duty of fair representation (“DFR”) against the Branch; and arbitrator misconduct against Gilder. Id. This case was referred to the magistrate judge for all pretrial matters pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). ECF No. 8.
On May 11, 2022, the Branch filed a motion to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). ECF No. 17. Hale timely responded to the motion on May 31, 2022. ECF No. 27. The Branch replied on June 3, 2022. ECF No. 28.
On September 27, 2022, the magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation (R&R). ECF No. 44. The R&R recommends that the Court GRANT the Branch's motion to dismiss the first of Hale's DFR claims (regarding the Branch's representation during arbitration) and DENY the motion to dismiss her second DFR claim (regarding the Branch's assistance in collecting Hale's back pay award).
No party has filed an objection to the R&R. The failure to object to conclusions in the magistrate judge's report releases the Court from its duty to independently review those issues. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985).
The Court has reviewed the record and ADOPTS the R&R as the findings and conclusions of the Court.
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the motion to dismiss by the Branch (ECF No. 17) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.