From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hale v. State

SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS
Nov 14, 2013
2013 Ark. 470 (Ark. 2013)

Opinion

No. CV-13-499

11-14-2013

BILLY RAY HALE APPELLANT v. STATE OF ARKANSAS APPELLEE

Billy R. Hale, pro se appellant.


PRO SE MOTION FOR

APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL AND

MOTION TO FILE BELATED REPLY

BRIEF, 39CV-13-12 [LEE COUNTY

CIRCUIT COURT, 39CV-13-12,

HON. L.T. SIMES, JUDGE]


MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF

COUNSEL GRANTED; MOTION TO

FILE BELATED REPLY BRIEF

MOOT.


PER CURIAM

Appellant Billy Ray Hale has lodged an appeal in this court from an order of the circuit court denying his pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus. Now before us are appellant's pro se motions for appointment of counsel and to file a belated reply brief. We find good cause to grant the motion for appointment of counsel and appoint Misty Borkowski. Our clerk is directed to set a new briefing schedule for the appeal. As counsel has been appointed, the motion to file belated reply brief is moot.

Motion for appointment of counsel granted; motion to file belated reply brief moot.

Billy R. Hale, pro se appellant.


Summaries of

Hale v. State

SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS
Nov 14, 2013
2013 Ark. 470 (Ark. 2013)
Case details for

Hale v. State

Case Details

Full title:BILLY RAY HALE APPELLANT v. STATE OF ARKANSAS APPELLEE

Court:SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS

Date published: Nov 14, 2013

Citations

2013 Ark. 470 (Ark. 2013)