From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hale v. State

Supreme Court of Florida.
Apr 8, 2014
139 So. 3d 885 (Fla. 2014)

Opinion

No. SC13–2542.

2014-04-8

William J. HALE, Petitioner(s) v. STATE of Florida, Respondent(s).


Because petitioner has failed to show a clear legal right to the relief requested, he is not entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is hereby denied. See Huffman v. State, 813 So.2d 10, 11 (Fla.2000).

PARIENTE, LEWIS, CANADY, LABARGA, and PERRY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Hale v. State

Supreme Court of Florida.
Apr 8, 2014
139 So. 3d 885 (Fla. 2014)
Case details for

Hale v. State

Case Details

Full title:William J. HALE, Petitioner(s) v. STATE of Florida, Respondent(s).

Court:Supreme Court of Florida.

Date published: Apr 8, 2014

Citations

139 So. 3d 885 (Fla. 2014)