From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hale v. Saltamacchia

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 25, 2006
28 A.D.3d 715 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)

Opinion

2005-06665.

April 25, 2006.

In an action to recover damages for wrongful death, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Weiss, J.), dated May 31, 2005, which denied his motion for leave to serve an amended complaint to assert a claim for punitive damages.

Sullivan Papain Block McGrath Cannavo, P.C., New York, N.Y. (Stephen C. Glasser of counsel), for appellant.

Mulholland, Minion Roe, Williston Park, N.Y. (Christine M. Gibbons and Brian R. Davey of counsel), for respondents Joseph Saltamacchia and Anthony Saltamacchia.

Before: Schmidt, J.P., Skelos, Lunn and Dillon, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the plaintiff's motion for leave to amend the complaint to add a claim for punitive damages. Evidence that the defendant driver, Anthony Saltamacchia, was convicted of leaving the scene of an accident, although reprehensible, was not a proximate cause of the injuries to the plaintiff's decedent ( see Boykin v. Mora, 274 AD2d 441; Taylor v. Dyer, 190 AD2d 902; cf. Rahn v. Carkner, 241 AD2d 585). Moreover, the defendant Joseph Saltamacchia, the owner of the vehicle, can only be vicariously liable for the collision and thus cannot be liable for punitive damages ( see Poulard v. Papamihlopoulos, 254 AD2d 266).

The plaintiff's remaining contentions are without merit.


Summaries of

Hale v. Saltamacchia

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 25, 2006
28 A.D.3d 715 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
Case details for

Hale v. Saltamacchia

Case Details

Full title:R. WALTER HALE III, Appellant, v. JOSEPH SALTAMACCHIA et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 25, 2006

Citations

28 A.D.3d 715 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 3049
814 N.Y.S.2d 218

Citing Cases

Joseph v. Baldera

But even if there were such a question of fact, Defendant Garcia still would be entitled to partial summary…

Deleo v. Cnty. of Monroe

The alleged subsequent conduct fails to support plaintiff's motion inasmuch as plaintiff does not allege any…