From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hale v. Napoleon

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Mar 21, 2014
Case No. 14-10691 (E.D. Mich. Mar. 21, 2014)

Opinion

Case No. 14-10691

03-21-2014

SENICA HALE, Petitioner, v. BENNY NAPOLEON, Respondent.


OPINION AND ORDER DISMISSING THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF

HABEAS CORPUS AND DENYING A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY

Wayne County Jail pre-trial detainee Senica Hale ("Petitioner") filed a pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 challenging his pre-trial proceedings and current confinement. At the time he instituted this action, Petitioner did not pay the required filing fee or submit an application to proceed in forma pauperis. As such, on February 18, 2014, the court issued a deficiency order requiring Petitioner to either pay the filing fee or submit a properly completed in forma pauperis application. The order provided that if he did not do so within 21 days, his case would be dismissed. Petitioner has not corrected the deficiency, or otherwise responded to the court's order.

Before Petitioner may appeal the court's decision, a certificate of appealability must issue. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(a); Fed. R. App. P. 22(b). A certificate of appealability may issue "only if the applicant has made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right." 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). However, when a district court denies habeas relief on procedural grounds without reaching the petitioner's constitutional claims, a certificate may issue if the petitioner shows that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether (1) the petition states a valid claim of a denial of a constitutional right; and (2) the district court was correct in its procedural ruling. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484-85 (2000). In the instance case, the court concludes that reasonable jurists would not debate the court's conclusion that the petition should be summarily dismissed without prejudice. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that the petition for writ of habeas corpus [Dkt. # 1] is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The court makes no determination as to the merits of Petitioner's claims.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a certificate of appealability is DENIED.

___________________

ROBERT H. CLELAND

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to counsel of record on this date, March 21, 2014, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

Lisa Wagner

Case Manager and Deputy Clerk

(313) 234-5522


Summaries of

Hale v. Napoleon

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Mar 21, 2014
Case No. 14-10691 (E.D. Mich. Mar. 21, 2014)
Case details for

Hale v. Napoleon

Case Details

Full title:SENICA HALE, Petitioner, v. BENNY NAPOLEON, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Mar 21, 2014

Citations

Case No. 14-10691 (E.D. Mich. Mar. 21, 2014)