From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hale v. Manchester Keene Railroad

Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough
Dec 1, 1881
61 N.H. 641 (N.H. 1881)

Opinion

Decided December, 1881.

Briggs Huse and W. E. Chandler, for the plaintiffs.

W. W. Bailey and F. A. Brooks (of Massachusetts), for the defendants.


All the objections now presented to the confirmation of the sale were equally objections to ordering the sale, and it must be presumed that they were either not presented, or if presented, were considered and overruled. By the decree ordering the sale the defendants are concluded upon all matters which were or might have been urged against that decree.

Exceptions overruled.

CLARK, J., did not sit: the others concurred.


Summaries of

Hale v. Manchester Keene Railroad

Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough
Dec 1, 1881
61 N.H. 641 (N.H. 1881)
Case details for

Hale v. Manchester Keene Railroad

Case Details

Full title:HALE a. v. MANCHESTER KEENE RAILROAD a

Court:Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough

Date published: Dec 1, 1881

Citations

61 N.H. 641 (N.H. 1881)

Citing Cases

McAllister v. Elliot

In that case, as in the present one, the court was called upon to decide between the conflicting claims of…

COX v. LEVISTON

Plaisted v. Holmes, 58 N.H. 619; Bell v. Lamprey, 58 N.H. 124; Bell v. Woodward, 48 N.H. 437, 443; Russell v.…