From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hale v. Johnson & Johnson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON DIVISION
Sep 18, 2020
Civil Action No. 2:13-cv-33608 (S.D.W. Va. Sep. 18, 2020)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 2:13-cv-33608

09-18-2020

KIMBERLY HALE, Plaintiff, v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, and ETHICON, INC., Defendants.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

On August 27, 2020, I entered an order directing plaintiff to show cause on or before September 10, 2020, why her case should not be dismissed without prejudice as to the remaining defendants pursuant to Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff has not shown cause. The court ORDERS that plaintiff's case must be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 4(m) for failure to serve the remaining defendants within 90 days after the complaint was filed.

The court DIRECTS the Clerk to send a copy of this Order to counsel of record and any unrepresented party.

ENTER: September 18, 2020

/s/_________

JOSEPH R. GOODWIN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Hale v. Johnson & Johnson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON DIVISION
Sep 18, 2020
Civil Action No. 2:13-cv-33608 (S.D.W. Va. Sep. 18, 2020)
Case details for

Hale v. Johnson & Johnson

Case Details

Full title:KIMBERLY HALE, Plaintiff, v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, and ETHICON, INC.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON DIVISION

Date published: Sep 18, 2020

Citations

Civil Action No. 2:13-cv-33608 (S.D.W. Va. Sep. 18, 2020)