From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hale v. City of Morrilton

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Dec 10, 2024
4:23-cv-1153-DPM (E.D. Ark. Dec. 10, 2024)

Opinion

4:23-cv-1153-DPM

12-10-2024

QUENTIN HALE #553659, PLAINTIFF v. CITY OF MORRILTON and NATHAN WATKINS, Police Officer, Morrilton Police Department, DEFENDANTS


ORDER

D.P. Marshall, Jr. United States District Judge

The Court warned Hale that if he did not move to reopen his complaint by 6 December 2024, then the Court would dismiss his complaint without prejudice. Doc. 3. Hale has not responded, and the time to do so has passed. The stay is lifted. Hale's complaint is therefore dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. LOCAL RULE 5.5(c)(2).

So Ordered.


Summaries of

Hale v. City of Morrilton

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Dec 10, 2024
4:23-cv-1153-DPM (E.D. Ark. Dec. 10, 2024)
Case details for

Hale v. City of Morrilton

Case Details

Full title:QUENTIN HALE #553659, PLAINTIFF v. CITY OF MORRILTON and NATHAN WATKINS…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas

Date published: Dec 10, 2024

Citations

4:23-cv-1153-DPM (E.D. Ark. Dec. 10, 2024)