From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hale House Center v. Lee

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Sep 23, 2003
308 A.D.2d 390 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

1633

September 23, 2003.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Shirley Werner Kornreich, J.), entered April 30, 2003, which, in an action for accountant malpractice and breach of contract, denied defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, with leave to renew upon completion of disclosure, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Sean C. Sheely, for plaintiffs-respondents.

Stuart Mack, for defendant-appellant.

Before: Buckley, P.J., Nardelli, Tom, Mazzarelli, Gonzalez, JJ.


Additional disclosure is necessary on the merits, as well as on the threshold statute of limitations issue and related continuous representation doctrine (see Ackerman v. Price Waterhouse, 252 A.D.2d 179, 205), before summary disposition can be considered.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

Hale House Center v. Lee

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Sep 23, 2003
308 A.D.2d 390 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

Hale House Center v. Lee

Case Details

Full title:HALE HOUSE CENTER, INC., ET AL., Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. MICHAEL LEE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Sep 23, 2003

Citations

308 A.D.2d 390 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
764 N.Y.S.2d 626

Citing Cases

Kerman v. Friedman

The plaintiff's motion was properly denominated as one for leave to reargue, even though the Supreme Court…