From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Halder v. Penny Mac Loan Servs., LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
May 6, 2013
No. C 12-05757 RS (N.D. Cal. May. 6, 2013)

Opinion

No. C 12-05757 RS

05-06-2013

ANTHONY HALDER and ARPA HALDER, individually and as trustees of the 2012 Halder Family Trust Dated February 29, 2012, Plaintiffs, v. PENNY MAC LOAN SERVICES, LLC; OLD REPUBLIC TITLE COMPANY; OLD REPUBLIC DEFAULT MANAGEMENT SERVICES, a division of OLD REPUBLIC DIVERSIFIED SERVICES, INC.; OLD REPUBLIC NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY; MORTGATGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC.; CITIMORTGAGE, INC. and DOES 1-100, inclusive, Defendants.


ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH

PREJUDICE

Plaintiffs Anthony and Arpa Halder filed a complaint advancing a variety of state law claims as well as violations of the Truth In Lending Act (TILA), 15 U.S.C. § 1601, and Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) violations under 18 U.S.C. § 1962. The Halders sought to stop the foreclosure of their home and obtain legal title, and possession of it, from defendants on the basis that they lack the power to foreclose as the deeds of trust recorded on their property are defective. Represented by counsel, they sued a variety of the organizations that were involved in issuing the mortgage on their home, including Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. (MERS), the original beneficiary of the deed of trust executed when they took out the mortgage in question, PennyMac Loan Services, LLC (PLS), who serviced the loan on behalf of non-party PennyMac (to whom MERS purportedly assigned the deed of trust), Old Republic Title Company, the trustee of the original deed of trust, and Old Republic Default Management Services (Old Republic), the division of Old Republic Title Company that recorded the notice of default on their home. MERS and Penny Mac jointly moved to dismiss the complaint, as did Old Republic Default Management Services.

The motion to dismiss was granted without prejudice and the Halders were informed that failure to file an amended complaint on or before April 29, 2013, would result in their case being dismissed without further notice. No such complaint having been filed, it hereby is.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

______________________

RICHARD SEEBORG

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Halder v. Penny Mac Loan Servs., LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
May 6, 2013
No. C 12-05757 RS (N.D. Cal. May. 6, 2013)
Case details for

Halder v. Penny Mac Loan Servs., LLC

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY HALDER and ARPA HALDER, individually and as trustees of the 2012…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Date published: May 6, 2013

Citations

No. C 12-05757 RS (N.D. Cal. May. 6, 2013)