From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Halcomb v. State

ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION III
Apr 11, 2018
2018 Ark. App. 248 (Ark. Ct. App. 2018)

Opinion

No. CR-17-848

04-11-2018

KIRK DAVID HALCOMB APPELLANT v. STATE OF ARKANSAS APPELLEE

Kirk David Halcomb, pro se appellant. Leslie Rutledge, Att'y Gen., by: Brooke Jackson Gasaway, Ass't Att'y Gen., for appellee.


APPEAL FROM THE ASHLEY COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT
[NO. 02CR-10-145] HONORABLE ROBERT BYNUM GIBSON, JR., JUDGE DISMISSED WAYMOND M. BROWN, Judge

Appellant Kirk Halcomb appeals from the order of the Ashley County Circuit Court denying his pro se petition for Rule 37 postconviction relief. Because he is no longer incarcerated, we dismiss the appeal.

Postconviction relief pursuant to Arkansas Rule of Criminal Procedure 37.1 is available to a "petitioner in custody under sentence of a circuit court." For purposes of Rule 37 relief, "in custody" has been construed to mean physically incarcerated. See Criswell v. State, 2014 Ark. 205; Branning v. State, 2010 Ark. 401; Bohanan v. State, 336 Ark. 367, 985 S.W.2d 708 (1999).

On March 5, 2018, appellant filed a change of address with the clerk of the court stating, "Appellant has served his 2 yr sentence and has been released from the Delta Unit in Dermott, Ar." Because appellant has been released from physical custody, Rule 37.1 postconviction relief is no longer available to him, as the granting of relief would have no practical effect. See Criswell, supra.

Dismissed.

GLADWIN and MURPHY, JJ., agree.

Kirk David Halcomb, pro se appellant.

Leslie Rutledge, Att'y Gen., by: Brooke Jackson Gasaway, Ass't Att'y Gen., for appellee.


Summaries of

Halcomb v. State

ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION III
Apr 11, 2018
2018 Ark. App. 248 (Ark. Ct. App. 2018)
Case details for

Halcomb v. State

Case Details

Full title:KIRK DAVID HALCOMB APPELLANT v. STATE OF ARKANSAS APPELLEE

Court:ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION III

Date published: Apr 11, 2018

Citations

2018 Ark. App. 248 (Ark. Ct. App. 2018)

Citing Cases

Taylor v. Ark. Dep't of Human Servs.

Because appellant was not in custody, the circuit court lacked jurisdiction to consider his petition for…