Halcomb v. Halcomb

2 Citing cases

  1. Martin v. Popa

    NO. 2014-CA-001364-MR (Ky. Ct. App. Apr. 15, 2016)   Cited 1 times

    Being personally served with a subpoena while in Kentucky is sufficient to bring a person under the jurisdiction of a Kentucky Court. International Shoe, 326 U.S. at 316; Halcomb v. Halcomb, 337 S.W.2d 32, 33 (Ky. 1960). In addition, Kentucky Rule of Civil Procedure (CR) 45.03(1) states in relevant part:

  2. Cummings v. Cummings

    182 Ariz. 383 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1995)   Cited 65 times
    Holding that a court may "take into account any regular and substantial benefits a parent receives from remarriage"

    With respect to the appellant's suggestion that the wife's parents should support the child because they are wealthy we need only say that we are amazed that such a suggestion could seriously be made. Halcomb v. Halcomb, 337 S.W.2d 32, 34 (Ky. 1960).