From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hakim v. Bay Sales Corp.

United States District Court, D. New Jersey
Sep 18, 2007
Civil Action No.: 06-6088 (JLL) (D.N.J. Sep. 18, 2007)

Opinion

Civil Action No.: 06-6088 (JLL).

September 18, 2007


ORDER


This matter comes before the Court on three motions: Defendants' Bay Sales Corporation ("Bay Sales") and Core Brands, Incorporated ("Core Brands") motion to dismiss the Complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6); Plaintiffs' cross motion to remand, and Defendant Mirna Hamade's ("Hamade") motion to dismiss the Complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction and insufficient service of process. No oral argument was heard. Fed.R.Civ.P. 78. For the reasons set forth in this Opinion,

IT IS on this 17th day of September, 2007,

ORDERED that Plaintiffs shall show cause on or before October 8, 2007 why this matter should not be dismissed as alleged against Defendants James Miller, Michael Resnick and Earl Weinstein for failure to serve process in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m); and it is further ORDERED that Defendant Hamade's motion to dismiss the Complaint [Docket # 15] is GRANTED and the Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as alleged against Defendant Hamade; and it is further

ORDERED that Plaintiffs' motion to remand [Docket # 5] is DENIED as moot; and it is further

ORDERED that Defendants' motion to dismiss or in the alternative, for a more definite statement [Docket # 3] is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART; and it is further

ORDERED that Plaintiffs shall file an Amended Complaint on or before October 8, 2007 which provides a more definite statement with respect to the factual allegations and related causes of actions as directed by this Court's accompanying Opinion; and it is further

ORDERED that failure to amend within the time provided shall result in dismissal of the Complaint and the file being closed; and it is further

ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall note on the docket that Plaintiffs no longer retain Peter Robert Bray, Esq. as counsel [Docket # 16] in this matter; and it is further

ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall send a copy of this Order and of the accompanying Opinion by United States Mail to the Plaintiffs at 16 South William Street, Bergenfield, New Jersey 07621.


Summaries of

Hakim v. Bay Sales Corp.

United States District Court, D. New Jersey
Sep 18, 2007
Civil Action No.: 06-6088 (JLL) (D.N.J. Sep. 18, 2007)
Case details for

Hakim v. Bay Sales Corp.

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH HAKIM CATHY YACHOUH, Plaintiffs, v. BAY SALES CORPORATION, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, D. New Jersey

Date published: Sep 18, 2007

Citations

Civil Action No.: 06-6088 (JLL) (D.N.J. Sep. 18, 2007)