From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hajro v. E. Bay Mun. Util. Dist.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Sep 2, 2021
No. 19-CV-3406-YGR (N.D. Cal. Sep. 2, 2021)

Opinion

19-CV-3406-YGR

09-02-2021

Mirsad Hajro, Plaintiff, v. East Bay Municipal Utility District. Defendant.


ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE REGARDING

PLAINTIFF'S FAILURE TO RESPOND TO

DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

To Plaintiff And His Counsel Of Record:

Counsel for plaintiff is hereby Ordered to Show Cause why the motion should not be granted as unopposed. Defendant filed its motion for summary judgment on August 13, 2021. Under Local Rule 7-3(a), plaintiffs response to the motion was due August 27. To date, plaintiff has failed to file a response.

Counsel shall file a response to defendant's motion for summary judgment by no later than Tuesday, September 7, and a response to this Order. If plaintiff s responses are not received by that date, the Court will deem the motion submitted. If responses are filed, defendant shall file its reply brief by September 14, 2020.

A hearing on this Order to Show Cause shall be held, if necessary, at the same time as the hearing on the underlying motion which will be set at a later date.

It Is So Ordered.


Summaries of

Hajro v. E. Bay Mun. Util. Dist.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Sep 2, 2021
No. 19-CV-3406-YGR (N.D. Cal. Sep. 2, 2021)
Case details for

Hajro v. E. Bay Mun. Util. Dist.

Case Details

Full title:Mirsad Hajro, Plaintiff, v. East Bay Municipal Utility District. Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Sep 2, 2021

Citations

No. 19-CV-3406-YGR (N.D. Cal. Sep. 2, 2021)