From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Haizlip v. Peterson

United States District Court, Middle District of North Carolina
Mar 14, 2024
1:23-cv-210 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 14, 2024)

Opinion

1:23-cv-210

03-14-2024

JAMAL HAIZLIP, Plaintiff, v. SHANNON PETERSON, IV-D Attorney, ALEXANDRIA BURNETT, IV-D Agent, SHARON BARLOW Guilford County DSS Director, Defendants.


ORDER

On January 29, 2024, the United States Magistrate Judge's Order and Recommendation ("Recommendation") was filed, and notice was served on the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. (Docs. 4, 6.) No objections were filed within the time prescribed by Section 636.

Therefore, the court need not make a de novo review and the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation is hereby adopted.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation, (Doc. 4), is ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) for failing to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.

A Judgment dismissing this action will be entered contemporaneously with this Order.


Summaries of

Haizlip v. Peterson

United States District Court, Middle District of North Carolina
Mar 14, 2024
1:23-cv-210 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 14, 2024)
Case details for

Haizlip v. Peterson

Case Details

Full title:JAMAL HAIZLIP, Plaintiff, v. SHANNON PETERSON, IV-D Attorney, ALEXANDRIA…

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of North Carolina

Date published: Mar 14, 2024

Citations

1:23-cv-210 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 14, 2024)