From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Haiskins v. Jorge

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 14, 1989
147 A.D.2d 529 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Opinion

February 14, 1989

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (LeVine, J.).


Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed.

Based upon a review of the record, we conclude that the Supreme Court erred in denying Avis's motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3216 for failure to prosecute. Although the plaintiff's papers submitted in opposition to Avis's motion arguably set forth a reasonable excuse for her failure to comply with Avis's 90-day demand to serve and file a note of issue pursuant to CPLR 3216 (b) (3), the plaintiff failed to submit an affidavit of merits or a verified pleading in lieu thereof. Accordingly, dismissal of the complaint was required (see, CPLR 3216 [e]; Groves v City of Newburgh, 126 A.D.2d 605). Mollen, P.J., Mangano, Brown and Sullivan, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Haiskins v. Jorge

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 14, 1989
147 A.D.2d 529 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
Case details for

Haiskins v. Jorge

Case Details

Full title:BETTY HAISKINS, Respondent, v. JIMENEL JORGE, Defendant, and AVIS RENT A…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 14, 1989

Citations

147 A.D.2d 529 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
537 N.Y.S.2d 831

Citing Cases

Gonzalez v. County of Westchester

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying that branch of the appellant's motion which…

Dr. Tak's Med. & Rehab., P.C. v. Geico

B. Lack of Meritorious Cause of ActionTo demonstrate the existence of a meritorious cause of action,…