From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Haisha v. Countrywide Bank

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Sep 8, 2011
Case No. 2:11-cv-11276 (E.D. Mich. Sep. 8, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 2:11-cv-11276

09-08-2011

STEVEN H. HAISHA and NADIA A. HAISHA, Plaintiffs, v. COUNTRYWIDE BANK, FSB, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ASSESSING SANCTIONS

On July 29, 2011, the court issued an "Opinion and Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendants' Motion for Sanctions and Directing Defendants to Account for Attorney Fees." In its order, the court assessed sanctions, in an amount to be determined, against Plaintiff's counsel Julian Levant and Plaintiff Steven Haisha pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1927 and Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The court also directed Defendants Bank of America, N.A. ("BANA") and BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP ("BAC") (collectively "Defendants") to file an accounting of attorney fees reasonably incurred in defending this action. The court then gave Mr. Levant and Plaintiff Steven Haisha fourteen days from the date of Defendants' submission to file objections to Defendants' calculations. (July 29, 2011 Order 11.)

On August 16, 2011, Attorney Melissa Benton filed a declaration detailing a total of $6,331.20 in attorney fees and $412.70 in costs incurred by Defendants in this case. Neither Mr. Levant nor Plaintiff Steven Haisha has objected to Defendants' accounting.

Defendants filing was untimely, as it exceeded the deadline imposed by the court by four days. Nevertheless, given the particular circumstances of this case and the only minor delay, the court will accept the filing. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b).

In assessing a party's request for attorney fees, the court must ensure the fees are reasonable with reference to the "lodestar" approach. Gonter v. Hunt Valve Co., 510 F.3d 610, 616 (6th Cir. 2007) (citing Reed v. Rhodes, 179 F.3d 453, 471 (6th Cir. 1999) and Hensley v. Eckerhart, 461 U.S. 424, 432 (1983)). A court determines the lodestar amount by multiplying the reasonable number of hours billed by a reasonable billing rate. Hensley, 461 U.S. at 433. "The party seeking an award of fees should submit evidence supporting the hours worked and the rates claimed." Id. The court has reviewed the itemization and finds that the requested hours and hourly rates are reasonable and directly attributable to Defendants' defense of this litigation. The court will therefore award sanctions to Defendants in the full amount of attorney fees and costs requested.

The hourly rates used by Ms. Benton and her associates—$189 and $230 for work done by attorneys, $130 for work done by a paralegal—are "in line with those prevailing in the community" for this type of litigation. Blum v. Stenson, 465 U.S. 886, 895 n.11 (1984).

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that attorney fees and costs are AWARDED to Defendants and against Attorney Julian Levant and Plaintiff Steven Haisha, jointly and severally, in the amount of $6,743.90. A separate judgment will issue.

ROBERT H. CLELAND

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to counsel of record on this date, September 8, 2011, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

Lisa Wagner

Case Manager and Deputy Clerk

(313) 234-5522


Summaries of

Haisha v. Countrywide Bank

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Sep 8, 2011
Case No. 2:11-cv-11276 (E.D. Mich. Sep. 8, 2011)
Case details for

Haisha v. Countrywide Bank

Case Details

Full title:STEVEN H. HAISHA and NADIA A. HAISHA, Plaintiffs, v. COUNTRYWIDE BANK…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Sep 8, 2011

Citations

Case No. 2:11-cv-11276 (E.D. Mich. Sep. 8, 2011)