From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hairston v. U.S.

United States District Court, N.D. West Virginia, Martinsburg
Dec 21, 2006
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:06CV123, CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 3:00CR24 (N.D.W. Va. Dec. 21, 2006)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:06CV123, CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 3:00CR24.

December 21, 2006


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION


On this day the above styled case came before the Court for consideration of the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge James E. Seibert (Doc. No. 6), dated November 7, 2006, and petitioner's corresponding objections (Doc. No. 7), filed November 27, 2006. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), this Court conducted a de novo review of the above. As a result, the Court is of the opinion that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 6) should be, and is hereby, ORDERED adopted. Accordingly, for the reasons stated more fully in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, petitioner's § 2255 motion (Doc. No. 1) is DENIED and DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as an unauthorized successive petition. It is further ORDERED that this action be and is hereby STRICKEN from the active docket of this Court.

It is so ORDERED.

The Clerk is directed to transmit true copies of this Order to the petitioner and all counsel of record herein.


Summaries of

Hairston v. U.S.

United States District Court, N.D. West Virginia, Martinsburg
Dec 21, 2006
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:06CV123, CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 3:00CR24 (N.D.W. Va. Dec. 21, 2006)
Case details for

Hairston v. U.S.

Case Details

Full title:ARTHUR L. HAIRSTON, SR., Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. West Virginia, Martinsburg

Date published: Dec 21, 2006

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:06CV123, CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 3:00CR24 (N.D.W. Va. Dec. 21, 2006)