From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hairston v. Thompson

United States District Court, M.D. Louisiana
Feb 6, 2007
CIVIL ACTION NO. 05-1235-D-M1 (M.D. La. Feb. 6, 2007)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 05-1235-D-M1.

February 6, 2007


RULING AND ORDER


The court has carefully considered the petition, the record, the law applicable to this action, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Riedlinger dated January 22, 2007 (doc. no. 7). The plaintiffs have filed an objection which merely restates their prior arguments and has been duly considered.

The court hereby approves the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge and adopts it as the court's opinion herein. Accordingly, the Motion for Reinstatement and for Leave to Substitute Parties is DENIED. Further, the clerk of court is directed to not accept any further filings from the plaintiffs in this case, other than a notice to appeal.


Summaries of

Hairston v. Thompson

United States District Court, M.D. Louisiana
Feb 6, 2007
CIVIL ACTION NO. 05-1235-D-M1 (M.D. La. Feb. 6, 2007)
Case details for

Hairston v. Thompson

Case Details

Full title:IRENE HAIRSTON, ET AL v. BRYANT C. THOMPSON, ET AL

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Louisiana

Date published: Feb 6, 2007

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 05-1235-D-M1 (M.D. La. Feb. 6, 2007)