From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hairston v. Saul

United States District Court, Northern District of Florida
Jul 23, 2021
5:20-CV-119-RV-HTC (N.D. Fla. Jul. 23, 2021)

Opinion

5:20-CV-119-RV-HTC

07-23-2021

CLIFTON JAMES HAIRSTON, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


ORDER

ROGER VINSON SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

The magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation on July 9, 2021 (ECF No. 19). The parties were furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of all timely filed objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and the timely filed objections thereto (doc. 20), I have determined the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 19) is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.
2. The decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED.
3. The clerk of court is directed to enter judgment accordingly, pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. §. 405(g), AFFIRMING the decision of the Commissioner.
4. The Clerk is directed to close this case.

DONE AND ORDERED.


Summaries of

Hairston v. Saul

United States District Court, Northern District of Florida
Jul 23, 2021
5:20-CV-119-RV-HTC (N.D. Fla. Jul. 23, 2021)
Case details for

Hairston v. Saul

Case Details

Full title:CLIFTON JAMES HAIRSTON, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social…

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of Florida

Date published: Jul 23, 2021

Citations

5:20-CV-119-RV-HTC (N.D. Fla. Jul. 23, 2021)

Citing Cases

Sailem v. Kijakazi

Instead, any connection between Plaintiff's appointments and future absenteeism “is purely speculative as it…

Ochmanski v. Kijakazi

Figueroa-Padilla v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec., No. 619CV2119ORL37GJK, 2020 WL 8083897, at *2 (M.D. Fla. Dec. 28,…