From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hairston v. Folino

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Jun 4, 2012
Civil Action No. 12-313 (W.D. Pa. Jun. 4, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 12-313

06-04-2012

KENNETH HAIRSTON, Petitioner, v. LOUIS FOLINO, et al. Respondents


ORDER

AND NOW, this 4th day June, 2012, after the Petitioner, Kenneth Hairston, filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus, and after a Report and Recommendation was filed by the United States Magistrate Judge granting the parties fourteen days after being served with a copy to file written -objections thereto, and upon consideration of the objections filed by the petitioner, and upon written review of the petition and the record and upon consideration of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 5), which is adopted as the opinion of this Court,

IT IS ORDERED that the petition for writ of habeas corpus filed by Petitioner (Docket No. 4) is dismissed and a certificate of appealability is denied.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to Rule 4 (a) (1.' of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure if the Petitioner desires to appeal from this Order he must do so within thirty (30) days by filing a notice of appeal as provided i.n Rule 3, Fed. R. App. P.

____________________

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Hairston v. Folino

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Jun 4, 2012
Civil Action No. 12-313 (W.D. Pa. Jun. 4, 2012)
Case details for

Hairston v. Folino

Case Details

Full title:KENNETH HAIRSTON, Petitioner, v. LOUIS FOLINO, et al. Respondents

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Jun 4, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 12-313 (W.D. Pa. Jun. 4, 2012)