From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hairston v. Folino

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Aug 31, 2012
Civil Action No. 12-359 (W.D. Pa. Aug. 31, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 12-359

08-31-2012

CRAIG ALAN HAIRSTON, Petitioner, v. L. FOLINO, et al., Respondents.


ORDER

AND NOW, this 31st day of August, 2012, after a petition for a writ of habeas corpus was filed by the petitioner, Craig Alan Hairston, and after a Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge was issued, and the parties were accorded an opportunity to file written objections thereto, and upon consideration of the objections filed by the petitioner, and after independent review of the petition and the record, and upon consideration of the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, which is adopted and incorporated as the opinion of this Court,

IT IS ORDERED that the petition of Craig Alan Hairston for a writ of habeas corpus is dismissed, and that a certificate of appealability is denied, because reasonable jurists could not conclude that a basis for appeal exists. The Petitioner's Motion for Appointment Counsel (Document No. [5]) is denied, as moot.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1) of the F.R.App.P., if the petitioner desires to appeal from this Order, he must do so within thirty (30) days by filing a notice of appeal as provided by Rule 3 F.R.App.P.

Nora Barry Fischer

United States District Judge
cc/ecf: Magistrate Judge Robert C. Mitchell

Counsel of Record

Craig Alan Hariston

FC-9835

SCI Greene

175 Progress Drive

Waynesburg, PA 15370


Summaries of

Hairston v. Folino

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Aug 31, 2012
Civil Action No. 12-359 (W.D. Pa. Aug. 31, 2012)
Case details for

Hairston v. Folino

Case Details

Full title:CRAIG ALAN HAIRSTON, Petitioner, v. L. FOLINO, et al., Respondents.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Aug 31, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 12-359 (W.D. Pa. Aug. 31, 2012)