From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hainer v. Rhodes

Appellate Court of Illinois
Apr 18, 1947
331 Ill. App. 174 (Ill. App. Ct. 1947)

Opinion

Gen. No. 10,105. (Abstract of Decision.)

Opinion filed April 18, 1947 Rehearing denied May 7, 1947 Released for publication May 8, 1947

WILLS, § 507intestacy as to excess of land sale. In action to have will construed, claim that because proceeds of land sale would amount to more than legacies payable therefrom, there was intestacy as to excess, held untenable since under terms of will excess would go into residue.

See Callaghan's Illinois Digest, same topic and section number.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of LaSalle county; the Hon. ROY WILHELM, Judge, presiding.

Decree affirmed. Heard in this court at the October term, 1946.

Frank J. Harrison, for appellants;

Painter Hayes, Craig Craig, Fred H. Kelly, Jack E. Horsley, D.M. Gregg, and Charles W. Helmig, for certain appellees.


Not to be published in full. Opinion filed April 18, 1947; rehearing denied May 7, 1947; released for publication May 8, 1947.


Summaries of

Hainer v. Rhodes

Appellate Court of Illinois
Apr 18, 1947
331 Ill. App. 174 (Ill. App. Ct. 1947)
Case details for

Hainer v. Rhodes

Case Details

Full title:Sarah E. Hainer and Roy Hall, Appellants, v. Georgia Rhodes et al.…

Court:Appellate Court of Illinois

Date published: Apr 18, 1947

Citations

331 Ill. App. 174 (Ill. App. Ct. 1947)
72 N.E.2d 634

Citing Cases

In re Estate of Shaw

A general residuary clause is presumed to include all testator's property not otherwise distributed in the…