From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Haim v. Castro

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 30, 2000
272 A.D.2d 574 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

May 30, 2000

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Schneier, J.), dated February 9, 1999, which, upon a jury verdict on the issue of liability, is in favor of the defendant and against them and dismissed the complaint.

Before: Ritter, J.P., Sullivan, Altman and Feuerstein, JJ.


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The jury verdict in favor of the defendant should not be set aside as against the weight of the evidence because it was based upon a fair interpretation of the evidence ( see, Grippo v. Sinatra, 265 A.D.2d 301; Manna v. Don Diego, 261 A.D.2d 590; Nicastro v. Park, 113 A.D.2d 129).

The plaintiffs' remaining contention is without merit.


Summaries of

Haim v. Castro

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 30, 2000
272 A.D.2d 574 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Haim v. Castro

Case Details

Full title:KAHAN HAIM et al., Appellants, v. ALBERT CASTRO, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 30, 2000

Citations

272 A.D.2d 574 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
709 N.Y.S.2d 828

Citing Cases

Farrell v. Lewarn

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs. The Supreme Court properly denied the plaintiff's motion to…