Hailu v. Mayorkas

Full title: DEJENE ADEM HAILU, Plaintiff, v. ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, et al., Defendants.

Court: United States District Court, Western District of Washington

Date published: Dec 2, 2024

2:24-cv-01112-JHC (W.D. Wash. Dec. 2, 2024)

Opinion

2:24-cv-01112-JHC

12-02-2024

DEJENE ADEM HAILU, Plaintiff, v. ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, et al., Defendants.

TESSA M. GORMAN United States Attorney MICHELLE R. LAMBERT, NYS #4666657 Assistant United States Attorney Attorneys for Defendants THE LAW OFFICES OF KARIN TOLGU PLLC KARIN TOLGU, WSBA #42647 United States Attorney's Attorney for Plaintiff

JOHN H. CHUN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

TESSA M. GORMAN

United States Attorney

MICHELLE R. LAMBERT, NYS #4666657

Assistant United States Attorney

Attorneys for Defendants

THE LAW OFFICES OF KARIN TOLGU PLLC

KARIN TOLGU, WSBA #42647

United States Attorney's

Attorney for Plaintiff

STIPULATED MOTION TO DISMISS AND ORDER

JOHN H. CHUN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a), the parties stipulate to the dismissal of this case without prejudice, with each party to bear their own costs. Plaintiff brought this litigation pursuant to the Administrative Procedure Act and Mandamus Act seeking, inter alia, to compel U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (“USCIS”) to adjudicate his Form I-589, Application for Asylum and for Withholding of Removal. USCIS has adjudicated the Form I-589 and this case is now moot.

I certify that this memorandum contains 76 words, in compliance with the Local Civil Rules.

ORDER

The case is dismissed without prejudice. It is so ORDERED.