From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Haight v. Gates

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 6, 1942
264 App. Div. 819 (N.Y. App. Div. 1942)

Opinion

May 6, 1942.

Present — Crosby, P.J., Cunningham, Dowling, Harris and McCurn, JJ.


Order modified on the law by striking out the third and fourth ordering paragraphs and by inserting a new third ordering paragraph which denies a motion for a compulsory reference and as modified affirmed, without costs, on the ground that the actions do not come within the provisions of section 466 of the Civil Practice Act. All concur. (The order grants plaintiff's motion that the actions "1," "2" and "3" be tried together, without consolidation, and refers same to an official referee for trial.)


Summaries of

Haight v. Gates

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 6, 1942
264 App. Div. 819 (N.Y. App. Div. 1942)
Case details for

Haight v. Gates

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE M. HAIGHT, as Receiver of the SALT SPRINGS NATIONAL BANK OF…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: May 6, 1942

Citations

264 App. Div. 819 (N.Y. App. Div. 1942)