From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Haig v. Bissonette

U.S.
Mar 21, 1988
485 U.S. 264 (1988)

Opinion

CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

No. 86-987.

Decided March 21, 1988

800 F.2d 812, affirmed for absence of quorum.


Because the Court lacks a quorum, 28 U.S.C. § 1, and since a majority of the qualified Justices are of the opinion that the case cannot be heard and determined at the next Term of the Court, the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit is affirmed under 28 U.S.C. § 2109, which provides that under these circumstances the Court shall enter its order affirming the judgment of the court from which the case was brought for review with the same effect as upon affirmance by an equally divided Court.

THE CHIEF JUSTICE, JUSTICE O'CONNOR, JUSTICE SCALIA, and JUSTICE KENNEDY took no part in this decision.


Summaries of

Haig v. Bissonette

U.S.
Mar 21, 1988
485 U.S. 264 (1988)
Case details for

Haig v. Bissonette

Case Details

Full title:HAIG ET AL. v . BISSONETTE ET AL

Court:U.S.

Date published: Mar 21, 1988

Citations

485 U.S. 264 (1988)
108 S. Ct. 1253

Citing Cases

Wullschleger v. Peters

Next, the plaintiff argues that a violation of state law may also constitute a violation of federal law. In…

Wong v. Minn. Dep't of Human Servs.

Because this case comes to us on appeal in part from a dismissal for failure to state a claim, we take as…