From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hahn v. Minnesota

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Sep 16, 2013
Civil No. 12-2154 (JRT/JJG) (D. Minn. Sep. 16, 2013)

Opinion

Civil No. 12-2154 (JRT/JJG)

2013-09-16

KRIS ALAN HAHN , Plaintiff, v. STATE OF MINNESOTA, Defendants.

Kris Alan Hahn, 13928-041, FCC Petersburg-Medium, PO Box 1000, Petersburg, VA 23804, pro se plaintiff. Linda M Freyer, HENNEPIN COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, 300 South Sixth Street, Suite C-2000, Minneapolis, MN 55487 for defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION

Kris Alan Hahn, 13928-041, FCC Petersburg-Medium, PO Box 1000, Petersburg, VA 23804, pro se plaintiff.

Linda M Freyer, HENNEPIN COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, 300 South Sixth Street, Suite C-2000, Minneapolis, MN 55487 for defendant.

The above-entitled matter came before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. No objections have been filed to the Report and Recommendation in the time period permitted.

Based upon the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation are ADOPTED;
2. Kris Alan Hahn's Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 1) is DENIED; and
3. This case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. DATED: September 16, 2013
at Minneapolis, Minnesota

_______________

JOHN R. TUNHEIM

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Hahn v. Minnesota

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Sep 16, 2013
Civil No. 12-2154 (JRT/JJG) (D. Minn. Sep. 16, 2013)
Case details for

Hahn v. Minnesota

Case Details

Full title:KRIS ALAN HAHN , Plaintiff, v. STATE OF MINNESOTA, Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Date published: Sep 16, 2013

Citations

Civil No. 12-2154 (JRT/JJG) (D. Minn. Sep. 16, 2013)

Citing Cases

United States v. Childs

The defendant could be trying to challenge his recent state court conviction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254—but…

Bell v. Stenseth

Courts in this District and several Circuit Courts of Appeals have concluded that § 2254(d)(1)(A)'s one-year…