From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hahn v. Graco

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Dec 28, 2006
725 N.W.2d 375 (Minn. 2006)

Opinion

No. A06-1737.

December 28, 2006.

James S. Pikala, Christine L. Tuft, Arthur, Chapman, Kettering, Smetak Pikala, P.A., Minneapolis, MN, for Appellant.

Lawrence C. Miller, Miller Carlson, P.L.L.P., Minneapolis, MN, for Respondent.

Considered and decided by the court en banc.


ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers' Compensation Court of Appeals filed August 17, 2006, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn. 1982) (explaining that, "[s]ummary affirmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view," doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

Employee is awarded $1,200 in attorney fees.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ G. Barry Anderson Associate Justice


Summaries of

Hahn v. Graco

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Dec 28, 2006
725 N.W.2d 375 (Minn. 2006)
Case details for

Hahn v. Graco

Case Details

Full title:Kris HAHN, Respondent, v. GRACO, INC., Self-Insured/Adm'd by ASU Risk…

Court:Supreme Court of Minnesota

Date published: Dec 28, 2006

Citations

725 N.W.2d 375 (Minn. 2006)