From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hague v. Napolitano

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 18, 2011
No. 1:11-cv-00656 LJO SMS (E.D. Cal. Aug. 18, 2011)

Opinion

No. 1:11-cv-00656 LJO SMS

08-18-2011

STACEY LYNN HAGUE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Janet Napolitano, Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, et al. Defendants.

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney Audrey B. Hemesath Assistant U.S. Attorney Attorneys for the Defendants Haitham Salem Ballout Attorney for the Plaintiffs


BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

AUDREY B. HEMESATH

Assistant United States Attorney

501 I Street, Suite 10-100

Sacramento, California 95814

Telephone: (916) 554-2729

Attorneys for Defendants

JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER RE:

EXTENSION OF TIME IN WHICH TO

FILE ANSWER TO THE COMPLAINT

This is an immigration case in which plaintiffs have challenged delay in agency action on an EOIR-29 Notice of Appeal to the Board of Immigration Appeals. The parties have previously stipulated to one extension of time for the filing of the government's answer. The parties now stipulate to hold the matter in abeyance, as Defendant United States Citizenship and Immigration Services has requested a remand of the case from the Board of Immigration Appeals toward the end of issuing a new decision. It is expected that this administrative process may take three to four months, and that at the conclusion of the process, the instant lawsuit may become moot. Accordingly, the parties stipulate that the time for the filing of the government's answer be extended to December 17, 2012, and that the scheduling conference and joint status report dates be similarly extended.

Respectfully submitted,

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

By: Audrey B. Hemesath

Assistant U.S. Attorney

Attorneys for the Defendants

By: Haitham Salem Ballout

Attorney for the Plaintiffs

ORDER

Pursuant to this Joint Stipulation and for the reasons stated therein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the matter is held in abeyance pending a possible remand from the Board of Immigration Appeals and a new decision by United States Citizenship and Immigration Services. The government's answer to the complaint is due on December 17, 2011, and the scheduling conference is reset from September 20, 2011 at 9:15 a.m. to January 18, 2012 at 9:00 a.m..

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Sandra M. Snyder

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Hague v. Napolitano

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 18, 2011
No. 1:11-cv-00656 LJO SMS (E.D. Cal. Aug. 18, 2011)
Case details for

Hague v. Napolitano

Case Details

Full title:STACEY LYNN HAGUE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Janet Napolitano, Secretary of…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Aug 18, 2011

Citations

No. 1:11-cv-00656 LJO SMS (E.D. Cal. Aug. 18, 2011)