From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Haggins v. Jackson

United States District Court, S.D. Georgia, Savannah Division
May 12, 2010
CASE NO. CV409-117 (S.D. Ga. May. 12, 2010)

Summary

using postmarked date as date filed since petitioner did not date the petition when he signed it

Summary of this case from Nunez v. United States

Opinion

CASE NO. CV409-117.

May 12, 2010


ORDER


Before the Court is the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 14), to which no objections have been filed. After a careful de novo review of the record, the Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED as the Court's Opinion in this case. Accordingly, the 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this case.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Haggins v. Jackson

United States District Court, S.D. Georgia, Savannah Division
May 12, 2010
CASE NO. CV409-117 (S.D. Ga. May. 12, 2010)

using postmarked date as date filed since petitioner did not date the petition when he signed it

Summary of this case from Nunez v. United States

using postmarked date where prisoner did not date the petition

Summary of this case from Williams v. United States
Case details for

Haggins v. Jackson

Case Details

Full title:KEITH HAGGINS, Petitioner, v. WARDEN DONALD JACKSON, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Georgia, Savannah Division

Date published: May 12, 2010

Citations

CASE NO. CV409-117 (S.D. Ga. May. 12, 2010)

Citing Cases

Williams v. United States

Under these circumstances, the date prison officials processed the motion for mailing is the date that I will…

Nunez v. United States

Under these circumstances, the postmarked date is the date that I will consider the §2255 motion was filed.…