From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Haggerty v. Thornton

Supreme Court of California.
Dec 22, 2021
287 Cal. Rptr. 3d 721 (Cal. 2021)

Opinion

S271483

12-22-2021

HAGGERTY v. THORNTON


The petition for review is granted.

Pending review, the opinion of the Court of Appeal, which is currently published at 68 Cal.App.5th 1003, 284 Cal.Rptr.3d 32, may be cited, not only for its persuasive value, but also for the limited purpose of establishing the existence of a conflict in authority that would in turn allow trial courts to exercise discretion under Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior Court (1962) 57 Cal.2d 450, 456, 20 Cal.Rptr. 321, 369 P.2d 937, to choose between sides of any such conflict. (See Standing Order Exercising Authority Under California Rules of Court, Rule 8.1115(e)(3), Upon Grant of Review or Transfer of a Matter with an Underlying Published Court of Appeal Opinion, Administrative Order 2021-04-21; Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(e)(3) and corresponding Comment, par. 2.)

Votes: Cantil-Sakauye, C.J., Corrigan, Liu, Kruger, Groban and Jenkins, JJ.


Summaries of

Haggerty v. Thornton

Supreme Court of California.
Dec 22, 2021
287 Cal. Rptr. 3d 721 (Cal. 2021)
Case details for

Haggerty v. Thornton

Case Details

Full title:HAGGERTY v. THORNTON

Court:Supreme Court of California.

Date published: Dec 22, 2021

Citations

287 Cal. Rptr. 3d 721 (Cal. 2021)
500 P.3d 994

Citing Cases

Balistreri v. Balistreri

Haggerty may be cited for "persuasive value," and "for the limited purpose of establishing the existence of a…