From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Haggerty v. Mangano

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jul 29, 1999
263 A.D.2d 430 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

July 29, 1999.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Lorraine Miller, J.), entered September 15, 1998, which denied defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint of plaintiff-tenant, unanimously affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

PRESENT: Sullivan, J. P., Nardelli, Tom and Wallach, JJ.


Plaintiff-tenant in the premises slipped on ice on the stoop of the building as she exited, fracturing her ankle. The accident happened approximately 75 minutes after a storm had deposited snow and ice in the area. Prior to the accident, defendants, or their agent, had cleared a path down the front steps.

As found by the IAS Court, there is a material issue of fact as to whether defendants' snow and ice removal prior to plaintiffs fall created a dangerous condition or increased the natural hazard ( see, Stoller v. Riverbay Corp., 222 A.D.2d 343). Further, plaintiff submitted an affidavit from a visitor to the premises that day who was present when a tenant complained of the icy condition of the steps to defendants' agents after the partial removal of snow and ice and before plaintiffs accident.


Summaries of

Haggerty v. Mangano

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jul 29, 1999
263 A.D.2d 430 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Haggerty v. Mangano

Case Details

Full title:PATRICIA HAGGERTY, Respondent, v. ROSOLINO MANGANO et al., Appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jul 29, 1999

Citations

263 A.D.2d 430 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
693 N.Y.S.2d 133