From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Haggerty v. Law Office of Carole A. Burns

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 17, 1997
244 A.D.2d 458 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

November 17, 1997

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Kutner, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The plaintiff failed to raise triable issues of fact which regard to his cause of action to recover damages for abuse of process ( see, Board of Educ. v. Farmingdale Classroom Teachers Assn., 38 N.Y.2d 397, 403; Aluminum Mill Supply Corp. v. Larkin, 129 A.D.2d 542; Bohm v. Holzberg, 47 A.D.2d 764). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment and granted the defendants' cross motion for summary judgment.

Rosenblatt, J. P., Copertino, Goldstein and Luciano, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Haggerty v. Law Office of Carole A. Burns

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 17, 1997
244 A.D.2d 458 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Haggerty v. Law Office of Carole A. Burns

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT H. HAGGERTY, Appellant, v. LAW OFFICE OF CAROLE A. BURNS et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 17, 1997

Citations

244 A.D.2d 458 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
665 N.Y.S.2d 913

Citing Cases

Haggerty v. Law Off. of Carole A. Burns

Decided June 9, 1998 Appeal from (2d Dept: 244 A.D.2d 458). MOTIONS FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL GRANTED OR…

Greenfield v. Brooke

ORDERED that the orders are affirmed, with one bill of costs. In response to the plaintiff's prima facie…