Opinion
Argued May 21, 1874
Decided September term, 1874
Amasa J. Parker for the appellant.
Nathaniel C. Moak for the respondent.
DWIGHT, C., reads for affirmance.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Haggerty v. Brooklyn City and Newtown Railroad Company
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Sep 1, 1874
61 N.Y. 624 (N.Y. 1874)
Summaries of
Haggerty v. Brooklyn City and Newtown Railroad Company
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Sep 1, 1874
61 N.Y. 624 (N.Y. 1874)
Case details for
Haggerty v. Brooklyn City and Newtown Railroad Company
Case Details
Full title:JAMES HAGGERTY, by Guardian, etc., Respondent, v . THE BROOKLYN CITY AND…
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Sep 1, 1874
Citations
61 N.Y. 624 (N.Y. 1874)
Citing Cases
Hamilton v. Standard Oil Co.
Dixon v. Frazier-Davis Co., 298 S.W. (Mo.) 827; Degonia v. Railroad, 224 Mo. 564; Kuhlman v. Water, Light…
Snyder v. St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co.We are also of the opinion that defendant in this cause should be held only according to the rules of law…