Haggarty v. Haggarty, 176 N.E.3d 234, 246 (Ind.Ct.App. 2021) (quoting Moriarty v. Moriarty, 150 N.E.3d 616, 626 (Ind.Ct.App. 2020), trans. denied).

In support, she includes two statements in her Statement of Facts concerning her alleged payment of the mediator's fee in November 2023, but those statements are unsupported by citations as required by Appellate Rule 46(A)(6)(a). Even if Marcie had provided citations and included in her appendix evidence of her belated payment of the mediator's fee, we could not consider that evidence because it was not presented to the trial court, see Haggarty v. Haggarty, 176 N.E.3d 234, 239 n.1 (Ind.Ct.App. 2021) (citing Morey v. Morey, 49 N.E.3d 1065, 1073 n.3 (Ind.Ct.App. 2016); App. R. 27). Therefore, the issue of Marcie's payment of the mediator's fee is not moot, and the evidence supports the trial court's finding that she failed to pay that fee.

Haggarty v. Haggarty, 176 N.E.3d 234, 251 (Ind.Ct.App. 2021) (quoting Eads v.Eads, 114 N.E.3d 868, 879 (Ind.Ct.App. 2018)).

"[W]e do not consider on appeal any evidence that was not presented to the trial court." Haggarty v. Haggarty, 176 N.E.3d 234, 239 n.1 (Ind.Ct.App. 2021); see also Indiana Appellate Rule 27 (defining record on appeal as "the Clerk's Record and all proceedings before the trial court").

When one party is in a superior position to pay fees over the other party, an award is proper." Haggarty v. Haggarty, 176 N.E.3d 234, 251 (Ind.Ct.App. 2021) (quoting Eads v. Eads, 114 N.E.3d 868, 879 (Ind.Ct.App. 2018)).

[¶14]Haggarty v. Haggarty, 176 N.E.3d 234, 246 (Ind.Ct.App. 2021) (quoting Moriarty v. Moriarty, 150 N.E.3d 616, 626 (Ind.Ct.App. 2020), trans. denied)

Consideration of these factors promotes the legislative purpose behind the award of attorney's fees, which is to ensure that a party who would not otherwise be able to afford an attorney is able to retain representation. When one party is in a superior position to pay fees over the other party, an award is proper. Haggarty v. Haggarty, 176 N.E.3d 234, 251 (Ind.Ct.App. 2021) (quoting Eads v. Eads, 114 N.E.3d 868, 879 (Ind.Ct.App. 2018)).

We will not consider such material on appeal. See Haggarty v. Haggarty, 176 N.E.3d 234, n.1 (Ind.Ct.App. 2021) (citing Morey v. Morey, 49 N.E.3d 1065, 1073 n.3 (Ind.Ct.App. 2016); Ind. Appellate Rule 27). [¶18] Affirmed.

[¶9] A trial court's discretion in crafting an attorney's fee award is necessarily broad. Haggarty v. Haggarty, 176 N.E.3d 234, 251 (Ind.Ct.App. 2021).

Talbott does not contend this finding by the trial court was clearly erroneous, and we accept it as true. SeeHaggarty v. Haggarty , 176 N.E.3d 234, 246 (Ind. Ct. App. 2021) ("We accept unchallenged findings as true, and we will affirm if the unchallenged findings are sufficient to support the judgment.")