From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hager v. Continental General Tire

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
Jun 26, 2001
48 S.W.3d 114 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001)

Opinion

No. ED 78799

June 26, 2001

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. LOUIS COUNTY, HONORABLE MICHAEL BYRON CALVIN.

Cornelius T. Ducey, Jr., Belleville, Illinois, for Appellant.

G. Keith Phoenix, St. Louis, Missouri, for Respondent.

Before Gary M. Gaertner, Sr., P.J., Lawrence G. Crahan, J., and George W. Draper III, J.



ORDER


Mark Hager and Ruth Hager, his duly appointed guardian and conservator, (hereinafter and collectively, "Hager") appeal the trial court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Continental General Tire, Inc. in Hager's products liability and negligence action. Hager claims the trial court erred in granting summary judgment based upon the expiration of the statute of limitations and the presumptively valid release form. We affirm.

We have reviewed all of the briefs and the record on appeal. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. There is no genuine issue of material fact or error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Hager v. Continental General Tire

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
Jun 26, 2001
48 S.W.3d 114 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001)
Case details for

Hager v. Continental General Tire

Case Details

Full title:MARK HAGER (A WARD OF THE COURT BY) RUTH HAGER, HIS DULY APPOINTED…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three

Date published: Jun 26, 2001

Citations

48 S.W.3d 114 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001)