Opinion
Civil Action 21 Civ. 11023 (JGK) (SLC)
11-14-2022
CHERYL HAGER-REILLY, Plaintiff, v. SCO FAMILY OF SERVICES, Defendant.
ORDER
SARAH L. CAVE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.
The Court is in receipt of Plaintiff's letter-motion requesting a stay of outstanding discovery deadlines. (ECF No. 71 (the “Motion to Stay”)). The principal prerequisite for issuance of a stay is “‘probable irreparable harm[.]'" 29 Brooklyn, LLC v. Chesley, No. 15 Civ. 5180 (ARR), 2015 WL 9255549, at *2 (E.D.N.Y. Dec. 16, 2015) (quoting In re Adelphia Commc'ns Corp., 361 B.R. 337, 347 (S.D.N.Y. 2007)). Because Plaintiff has failed to demonstrate probable irreparable harm, the Motion to Stay is DENIED.
To the extent an issue arises during depositions, the parties are reminded that they may contact Chambers in accordance with the Court's Individual Practices in Civil Cases.
See Individual Practices in Civil Cases, https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/practice documents/SLC%20Individual%20Practices%20in %20Civil%20Cases%20%E2%80%93%20September%2030th%2C%202022pdf (last visited Nov. 11, 2022).
The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close ECF No. 71.
SO ORDERED.