From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hagan v. City of Cleveland

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Sep 4, 2007
CASE NO. 1:06CV2507 (N.D. Ohio Sep. 4, 2007)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:06CV2507.

September 4, 2007


ORDER


The Court has been advised this action has settled and Probate Court approval of the settlement is forthcoming. Therefore, it is not necessary the action remain on the calendar of the Court.

IT IS ORDERED this action is closed. It shall be marked settled and dismissed, with prejudice, each party to bear its own costs. The Court shall retain jurisdiction to (1) vacate this Order and reopen the action upon cause shown that settlement has not been completed and further litigation is necessary or (2) alter the terms of settlement and dismissal upon agreement of the parties.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Hagan v. City of Cleveland

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Sep 4, 2007
CASE NO. 1:06CV2507 (N.D. Ohio Sep. 4, 2007)
Case details for

Hagan v. City of Cleveland

Case Details

Full title:BRIAN HAGAN, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of LARAY…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division

Date published: Sep 4, 2007

Citations

CASE NO. 1:06CV2507 (N.D. Ohio Sep. 4, 2007)