From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hagan v. Beard

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Apr 13, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:10-CV-0883 (M.D. Pa. Apr. 13, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:10-CV-0883

04-13-2012

DAMONT HAGAN, Plaintiff v. JEFFREY BEARD, et al., Defendants


(Judge Conner)


ORDER

AND NOW, this 13th day of April, 2012, upon consideration plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction (Doc. 84), in which he seeks to enjoin Tadd Bickell, the Superintendent at the State Correctional Institution at Huntingdon, and a non-party, from destroying his legal property relating to the instant civil action, and it appearing that plaintiff concedes that this Court lacks jurisdiction because he "[c]an not challenge defendants' allegations that Hagan can not request a preliminary injunction against a non-party" (Doc. 97, at 1) (see Elliott v. Kiesewetter, 98 F.3d 47, 56 (3d Cir. 1996) (finding that "[a] non-party cannot be bound by the terms of an injunction unless the non-party is found to be acting 'in active concert or participation' with the party against whom injunctive relief is sought. Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(d)'"), it is hereby ORDERED that the motion (Doc. 84) is DENIED.

Plaintiff brings this civil rights action against present and former State Correctional Institution at Camp Hill Special Management Unit staff. (Doc. 45 at 1-2.)

___________________________

CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Hagan v. Beard

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Apr 13, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:10-CV-0883 (M.D. Pa. Apr. 13, 2012)
Case details for

Hagan v. Beard

Case Details

Full title:DAMONT HAGAN, Plaintiff v. JEFFREY BEARD, et al., Defendants

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Apr 13, 2012

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:10-CV-0883 (M.D. Pa. Apr. 13, 2012)