From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Haft v. Haier U.S. Appliance Sols.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Oct 13, 2022
1:21-cv-00506-GHW (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 13, 2022)

Opinion

1:21-cv-00506-GHW

10-13-2022

ASHER HAFT, ROBERT FISHER, and CHERYL JONES, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. HAIER U.S. APPLIANCE SOLUTIONS, INC. d/b/a GE APPLIANCES, Defendants.

Thomas A. Pacheco MILBERG COLEMAN BRYSON PHILLIPS GROSSMAN PLLC Attorney for Plaintiffs


Thomas A. Pacheco MILBERG COLEMAN BRYSON PHILLIPS GROSSMAN PLLC Attorney for Plaintiffs

MOTION FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE OF ATTORNEY THOMAS A. PACHECO

Pursuant to Rule 1.3 of the Local Rules of the United States Courts for the Southern District of New York, Thomas A. Pacheco hereby moves this Court for an Order for admission to practice Pro Hac Vice to appear as counsel for Asher Haft, Robert Fisher, and Cheryl Jones (“Plaintiffs”) in the above-captioned action.

I am a member in good standing of the bars of the State of Maryland and the District of Columbia and there are no pending disciplinary proceedings against me in any state or federal court. I have never been convicted of a felony. I have never been censured, suspended, disbarred or denied admission or readmission by any court. I have attached the affidavit pursuant to Local Rule 1.3.

AFFIDAVIT OF THOMAS A. PACHECO IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR ADMISSION PROHAC VICE

I, Thomas A. Pacheco, being duly sworn and on oath can competently testify to the following facts from my personal knowledge:

1. I have been retained to represent Plaintiffs Asher Haft, Robert Fisher, and Cheryl Jones, in this cause of action.

2. I am not a resident of the State of New York.

3. I am in good standing of the bars of the State of Maryland (the Court of Appeals of Maryland) and the District of Columbia (the District of Columbia Court of Appeals).

4. There are no pending disciplinary actions against me.

5. I have not been subject to any disciplinary proceedings.

6. I have not been subject to any suspension proceedings.

7. I have not been subject to any disbarment proceedings.

8. I have not been subject to any criminal charges or proceedings.

9. I have never been convicted of a felony.

10. I have not, either by resignation, withdrawal, or otherwise terminated or attempted to terminate my office as any attorney in order to avoid administrative, disciplinary, disbarment, or suspension proceedings.

11. I have never been censured, suspended, disbarred or denied admission or readmission by any court.

Further affiant sayeth not.

SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me:

CERTIFICATE OF GOOD STANDING

STATE OF MARYLAND, ss:

I, Suzanne Johnson, Clerk of the Court of Appeals of Maryland, do hereby certify that on the fourteenth day of December, 2017, Thomas Arthur Pacheco having first taken and subscribed the oath prescribed by the Constitution and Laws of this State, was admitted as an attorney of said Court, is now in good standing, and as such is entitled to practice law in any of the Courts of said State, subject to the Rules of Court.

In Testimony Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand as Clerk, and affixed the Seal of the Court of Appeals of Maryland, this sixth day of October, 2022.

On behalf of JULIO A. CASTILLO, Clerk of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals, the District of Columbia Bar does hereby certify that Thomas Pacheco was duly qualified and admitted on November 12, 2018 as an attorney and counselor entitled to practice before this Court; and is, on the date indicated below, an Active member in good standing of this Bar.

The motion of Thomas A. Pacheco for admission to practice Pro Hac Vice in the above-captioned action is GRANTED.

Applicant has declared that he is a member in good standing of the bar of the states of Maryland and the District of Columbia and that his contact information is as follows:

Applicant's Name: Thomas Pacheco
Firm Name: Milberg Coleman Bryson Phillips Grossman PLLC
Address: 15453 Indianola Drive
City/State/Zip: Derwood, MD 20855
Telephone/Fax: (212) 946-9305

Applicant having requested admission Pro Hac Vice to appear for all purposes as counsel for Plaintiffs in the above captioned action;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Applicant is admitted to practice Pro Hac Vice in the above captioned action in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. All attorneys appearing before this Court are subject to the Local Rules of this Court, including the Rules governing discipline of attorneys.


Summaries of

Haft v. Haier U.S. Appliance Sols.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Oct 13, 2022
1:21-cv-00506-GHW (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 13, 2022)
Case details for

Haft v. Haier U.S. Appliance Sols.

Case Details

Full title:ASHER HAFT, ROBERT FISHER, and CHERYL JONES, individually and on behalf of…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Oct 13, 2022

Citations

1:21-cv-00506-GHW (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 13, 2022)